Harman and Rheingold believe that the study on remote viewing suggests that “the creative/intuitive mind could be getting data in ways other than from the lifelong learning of the person. study on telepathic transportation suggests that we are all joined at a deep level; study on psychokinesis indicates a association in the middle of mind and the external environment.” Researchers are probing the savant mind from the inside; using both gene mapping and Pet scans. Neuroscientists believe that “savants tap into areas of the mind that function like supercomputers, compiling heavy amounts of data from the senses to originate a working model of the world.” But where is this supercomputer located…in our wet biomolecular brain?
From the 1930s onwards, Wilder Penfield advanced a surgical procedure for epileptics, spicy the use of a local anesthetic to open up and operate on a patient’s exposed brain while the outpatient remained fully conscious. When he applied his electrode to the patient’s temporal lobe, the outpatient began to narrate a complete flashback to an lesson from earlier in his life. The scenes always moved forward, and only forward. If music was involved, this followed the exact primary tempo; the full score of which the patients would be able to hum with total accuracy — much as an autistic savant would be able to reproduce music with approximately complete accuracy — approximately like a recording.
Recorder
The temporal lobe has also been implicated in near-death experiences where “life reviews” occur. Life reviews have been described as viewing a movie, a video, a vivid 3d color display of your entire life or segments of your life. Some have described it as viewing a three-dimensional hologram of your life in full color, sound, and scent. Betty Eadie recounted that her life appeared before her in the form of what we might consider highly well defined holograms, but at gargantuan speed. The scenes can also go into a preview mode, viewing scenes of your life in petite bursts; at random, with the scenes of your life skipping from one scene to another; in fast-forward mode, viewing scenes of your life at a gargantuan speed; in slow-motion or paused, in order to focus on a particular information of your life. You may also enter the scene and relive your entire life with scenes of your life projected colse to you. This is very similar to how metaphysicist, Charles Leadbeater, described reading the “Akashic records” – approximately a century ago.
The role of forensic psychics in fighting baffling crimes appears to be growing. The psychics often felt the pain of the victim and in some cases viewed the crime scene from the attacker’s point of view. They were actually re-living the events. This is also obviously very similar to reading the Akashic records or undergoing a life narrate in a near-death experience.
It is believed that the Akashic records make clairvoyance and psychic perception possible. Some psychics who do past life readings claim to receive their data from the Akashic records. Forensic psychics, who aid the police in investigations, appear also, quite frequently, to be accessing these records. The data received in precognitive dreams (clairvoyant dreams relating to an event or a state not yet experienced) is often said to be ultimately derived from the Akashic records. The “Akashic records” was a term coined by the Theosophical movement (which originated in the 19th century) and referred to a universal filing ideas which records every thought, word, and action. These records are embedded or imprinted in the “Akasha” — which is the Sanskrit word for “sky”, “space” or “ether”.
Records Imprinted on the Fabric of Spacetime
Einstein displaced the ideas of the ether with his 1905 extra ideas (of relativity) and then resurrected the concept with the idea of a spacetime manifold in his 1915 general ideas (of relativity). Based on a contemporary interpretation (and a straightforward substitution of terms) the Akashic records would be said to be written on this spacetime manifold. In fact, Edgar Cayce said just that: “Upon time and space is written the thoughts, the deeds, the activities of an entity — as in relationships to its environs, its hereditary influence; as directed — or judgment drawn by or according to what the entity’s ideal is.”
When Cayce was asked to explain what was meant by “The Book of Life” he replied that it was, “The record that the private entity itself writes upon the skein of time and space…” World-renowned Cayce specialist Kevin Todeschi says that “The Edgar Cayce readings advise that each of us writes the story of our lives straight through our thoughts, our deeds, and our interactions with the rest of creation” — echoing Lynne McTaggart’s record of the dynamic interaction of the universe with the zero point field. Science reporter, Lynne McTaggart, says, “If all subatomic matter in the world is interacting constantly with this ambient ground-state vigor field, the subatomic waves of the [zero point] field are constantly imprinting a record of the shape of everything. As the harbinger and imprinter of all wavelengths and all frequencies, the zero point field is a kind of shadow of the universe for all time, a mirror image and record of everything that ever was.”
Is it a record or an Alternate Reality?
The well-respected Australian metaphysicist Robert Bruce defines the Akashic records as “an infinite, never-ending, inter-dimensional, energetic echo field, containing perpetual echoes [similar to the zero point field] generated by each and every act of consciousness, in energetic form. [Different] levels of the Akashic records can be accessed and perceived [or viewed] in various ways during an out-of-body experience, with the most tasteless being the primary ‘library’ scenario.” Bruce considers the records to be an energetic medium as opposed to the tasteless belief that the records are a structured repository of information.
Cayce alluded to the fact that the Akashic records were not naturally a transcription of the past but included the present and the future. Max Heindel said that in a “higher world” the “Memory of Nature” is read in an entirely separate manner; surface the essence of a whole life or event. In 1899, Leadbeater reported that on a “very high plane” the past, present and future are all existing simultaneously. He gives the analogy of a passenger in a train. “The passenger, if he could never leave the train nor alter its pace, would probably consider the passing landscapes as necessarily successive and would be unable to conceive their coexistence.” Leadbeater apparently incredible Einstein’s “block universe” concept and the relativity of simultaneity straight through his direct caress with super universes.
Paul Davies explains, “Physicists prefer to think of time as laid out in its entirety — a ‘timescape’, analogous to a landscape — with all past and future events placed there together.” This is generally described as the “block universe” concept in physics. according to Davies, “Human caress is temporal. Hence, we generally believe that only the present is real; while the past no longer exists and the future does not yet exist. We also frequently believe that the future is indeterminate and contingent. By contrast, in the block universe past, present, and future all exist simultaneously. All events are fully determined, and none are contingent.” Physicist Brian Greene says, “Just as we envision all of space as actually being out there, as actually existing, we should also envision all of time as actually being out there, as actually existing too.”
Einstein’s block universe bears a strong resemblance to descriptions of the nature and dynamics of the Akashic records in higher planes — by Edgar Cayce, Max Heindel, Charles Leadbeater and other metaphysicists. The examine now arises: Are the dynamic Akashic records being continuously written as situations occur in our world or is it naturally an alternate reality where time behaves differently? It is possible that when we “read” the Akashic records, we are actually peering into another reality where the portion of time is different. The observer may in fact be experiencing Einstein’s block universe – unencumbered by the restrictions of time. But how exactly do we read or caress the Akashic records?
Are the Akashic Records in the Brain?
It appears that cells in the brain are somehow “hyperlinked” to some non-local memory. In 1908 Leadbeater explained that there is an affinity in the middle of any particle of matter and the record which contains its history — an affinity which enables it to act as a kind of conductor in the middle of that record and the faculties of whatever who can read it. “The scenes straight through which we pass in the procedure of our life seem to act in the same manner upon the cells of our brain straight through which our mind is put en rapport with particular portions of the [Akashic] records,” he says.
Medical science and those connected with it assume that the data a someone has is buried inside the brain. But can this data be non-local? If so, how does the brain narrate and retrieve this data from non-local sources? Does the graphic brain have an invisible superstructure straight through which such communications are processed? The invisible superstructure that supports the activities of the brain, which has been discussed in the author’s book Brains and Realities, is a good candidate for this task. This invisible superstructure, which includes a involved of subtle electromagnetic bodies, transmits and receives data from non-local sources. The electromagnetic nature of these subtle bodies makes them good candidates to carry-out the involved calculations and recall that savants have. A “photographic” recall, Cd-like audio recall, fast calculations and video player-operations such as “fast-forwarding” and “rewinding” advise an electromagnetic substrate which can be found in subtle (higher vigor magnetic plasma) bodies. These are only “uncovered” or “unveiled” more fully when biochemical operations in the brain fail.
According to “Hebb’s rule” in neuroscience, when neurons repeatedly fire in a particular pattern, that pattern becomes a semi-permanent highlight of the brain — i.e. It becomes a memory. If the connections so formed should later prove of petite use, resulting from infrequent firings over the previously strengthened synapses, the connections weaken on their own from the lack of stimulation. Yet we know from the study of autistic savants that they can remember prodigious amounts of data from just one encounter with the stimulus artlessly even decades after the event with photographic clarity. There appears to be no need for rehearsal, reinforcement or constant recall to improve synapses. How does Hebb’s rule fit into all this? actually this suggests a separate type of memory mechanism which is clearly not explained in current neuroscience – which studies only the biomolecular brain. However, this type of memory mechanism would fit well with the workings of an “electronic brain” within electromagnetic subtle bodies.
Conclusion
So long as neuroscientists are fixated on the graphic brain, they will never comprehend that the biomolecular brain acts, just like a Tv, basically as a receiver and tuner. The scientist, who exclaims, “See, we have proof — the Pet scans show that the neural performance in the brain has changed,” is missing the point. All experiences can be interpreted by changes in the brain because the transmission passes straight through the brain. Unless the critic takes a wider view — gets his eyes off the Tv and looks colse to to see the background infrastructure of Tv aerials or cables, he will be oblivious to the fact that the signals are being transmitted from a broadcasting station.
In fact, all explanations come to be easier and more natural when we take the view that the biomolecular body and brain that is graphic to us is just the tip of an iceberg. There are invisible superstructures (according to plasma metaphysics) that Science is only beginning to suspect. In order for the paradigmatic shift to occur in neuroscience, neuroscientists must look to cutting-edge physics for the wider view. There are current scientific theories (taught in mainstream physics) which tell us that less than 5% of the universe is graphic to us. If that is the case, why treat the graphic brain as an end in itself? Isn’t it logically possible for an invisible superstructure to be supporting the more involved operations observed and currently being misattributed to mysterious processes in a wet biomolecular brain?
© Copyright Jay Alfred 2007
Akashic Records and The Brain
See Also : Freedom beach resort Earning host Audio bookcase